The available database comprises research projects in Fisheries, Aquaculture, Seafood Processing and Marine Biotechnology active in the time period 2003-2022.
BlueBio is an ERA-NET COFUND created to directly identify new and improve existing ways of bringing bio-based products and services to the market and find new ways of creating value from in the blue bioeconomy.

More information on the BlueBio project and participating funding organizations is available on the BlueBio website: www.bluebioeconomy.eu

Last Update: 2024/06/19

NA
Fisheries
Utprøving av ulike typer agn i fløytline-fisket på Øst-Finnmark og størrelsesseleksjon på hyse - Testing of different types of bait in the flute line fishing in East Finnmark and size selection on haddock
National Programme
National
Roger B. Larsen
roger.larsen@uit.no
UiT - The Arctic University of Norway (Norway)
NOFIMA - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (Norway)
2009
2009
€ 50,414
https://www.fhf.no/prosjekter/prosjektbasen/900298/
In the autumn of 2009, a project was carried out where the aim was to investigate allegations that a new bag bait from Iceland (Bernskan) had good properties for size selection in the line fishing for haddock. This has been brought to the fore through a growing problem around the mixing of undersized haddock in line catches throughout eastern Finnmark. The study included three different baits; Mackerel, sauri and bag bait, which were tested by placing the different bait types alternately on the line stump and measuring the length of all catch sorted by bait type. A total of 33 stumps (a 420 hook) were set with each bait and around 10,000 individuals were measured lengthwise. The results show that there were measurable differences in size composition. On the farm that was suitable with bag bait and sauri, the mixture of undersized fish was 4.5% and 6.6% less, respectively, than on mackerel. With regard to the question of whether any of the tested bait types can solve the problem of mixing undersized haddock in the line fishery in East Finnmark, this study clearly concludes that this is not the case. With the size distribution one had in the areas where the experiments were done, one will in any case have too high a mix of undersized fish to be able to conduct this type of fishing. If one asks whether there are differences in the selection characteristics of the different bait types, the result is more exciting. Differences were found between the baits in both size composition and catch efficiency, and it is possible that these characteristics could have been of great importance for the possibility of conducting a sound fishery if the catch composition had initially been closer to legal interference, and differences are already seen between profitability. which are interesting. If one is to focus on further developing bait with a view to selection, it will then be relevant to make a more comprehensive test of different baits according to the same model as this, but then over several geographical areas at different times of the year. If one then also finds clear patterns of selective properties, the next step will be to find out more specifically which properties of the bait (chemical composition, consistency, visual stimuli) that cause this and then try to cultivate these properties.
Fish; Fishing technology; Haddock; Longline fishing; Catch; Gear selectivity; Gear technology;
Barents Sea (27.I) Norwegian Sea (27.IIa)
map png
If there is any incorrect or missing information on this project please access here or contact bluebio.database@irbim.cnr.it
/* */